Got feedback on the new design? We're Listening! Send us Feedback

Poll: Less Than Half Of GOPers Know Rudy Is Pro-Choice »

Posted by: populist 1 year, 2 months ago

37 Comments Report this Story

7.2

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 8

Propped: 54

Comments: 37

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

Here's another interesting number buried in the new Pew Research poll released today that we referenced below: Less than half of Republicans know Rudy is pro-choice.

Read Full Story at tpmcafe.com

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 37
  • 100%
    RickyDawkins1 year, 2 months ago

    The other half of the republicans are too busy denying global warming, and discriminating against homosexuals.

    Reply
    • 100%
      OldRusty1 year, 2 months ago

      Whats pro-chice mean? is it the reverse of No choice.?

      Reply
      • 100%
        jaern1 year, 2 months ago

        Perhaps after voting Bush into office on a promise to reverse Roe V Wade and an amendment in the Constitution, the religious right found themselves without either or even a glimmer of a chance. Maybe these poor duped souls are looking to issues that really matter this time around.

        Reply
        • 100%
          1-2-Oscar1 year, 2 months ago

          For most Republicans (and most Americans), abortion is not a make-it-or-break-it issue. The press tends to stereotype members of each party according to positions strongly held by a vocal minority. It gives the pundits something to talk about that is not too complex for their feeble minds.

          Reply

          9 Replies

          • 0%
            ybdogsct1 year, 2 months ago

            OSCAR:

            "For most Republicans (and most Americans), abortion is not a make-it-or-break-it issue."

            This is only true once the candidate campaigns in the general election. But before a candidate faces the general election, the candidate must first win the party's nomination. And the more politically-active voters who attend campaign events, townhall meetings, debates, primaries, and caucuses well in advance of the general election tend to be more extreme than the average independent swing voter. It's no wonder that all of the Republican candidates are trying to cast themselves as the second coming of Ronald Reagan in order to win the core Republican base by demonstrating their conservative views on social issues.

            Each candidate has a team of pollsters measuring voter reactions to determine how to win over the most voters. There's a reason why a record of conservative actions on social issues always comes up during public debates between Republican candidates.

            Reply

            1 Reply

          • 100%
            deathray1 year, 2 months ago

            It's cognitive dissonance on the part of Republicans. They've spent 30 years calling anyone pro-choice a "baby killer.

            Yes, they don't break out the "baby killer" epithet until a Democrat shows up.

            Reply

            6 Replies

        • 94%
          foksipayne1 year, 2 months ago

          LOL, well they do now!!!

          Reply
          • 62%
            nostalgia1 year, 2 months ago

            Did you watch the debate last evening?

            It was funny when lightning struck the building and shorted out Giuliani's microphone when he was trying to explain his stand on abortion.

            Reply
            • 100%
              TomChicago1 year, 2 months ago

              Like flip-floppers Romney and McCain, Rudy is banking on our dim memories and indifference. All three seem to have a more cynical view of voters this time around assuming we don't really take anything they say seriously so they can say pretty much anything they want.

              Reply

              1 Reply

              • 0%
                DoerNotASayer1 year, 2 months ago

                Sounds like they went to Bush school of politics.

                Reply
              • 0%
                evelyna1 year, 2 months ago

                He isn't going to win and where did he get the money to run?

                Reply
                • 40%
                  k21bl1 year, 2 months ago

                  What's Clinton got to do with Giuliani. He's been out of office for years! Rudy would be just as bad or worse if he were elected. Like JohnQPublic said if it hadn't been for 911, he would have been long forgotten! He's a waste! Looser.

                  Reply
                  • 75%
                    DoerNotASayer1 year, 2 months ago

                    No surprise here, conservatives don't seem very well informed about anything. And what they do know they are hypocrites about.

                    Abortion rates have risen significantly under Bush, after going down under Clinton. Yet all these so called "pro-lifers" support Bush and bash Clinton.

                    It just goes to prove that they don't really care about life, they just care about controlling other people's lives.

                    Reply
                    • 80%
                      zembel1 year, 2 months ago

                      Freelance reporter Matt Lepacek, reporting for Infowars.com, was arrested for asking a question to one of Giuliani's staff members in a press conference. The press secretary identified the New York based reporter as having previously asked Giuliani about his prior knowledge of WTC building collapses and ordered New Hampshire state police to arrest him.

                      This is the exact question that must be asked over and over again at every event where either Giuliani or his advance team show up before the conventions next year

                      Reply
                      • 80%
                        superchase1 year, 2 months ago

                        Can the once liberal party of Lincoln, now run by reactionary Southern Red State Morons, stomach a candidate with such liberal social views from a blue state such as Guiliani? I think that the GOP is headed for another hardline right-wing Southerner. John McCain's anti-abortion, hardline views are the moderate center of that party.

                        Reply
                        • 40%
                          wildman65571 year, 2 months ago

                          The reason the Republicans are pro-life has to do with the coalition they have pulled together. It includes social conservatives therefore it is pro-life. If it included feminists, it would be pro-choice. Rudy obviously thinks that a different coalition that includes feminists instead of social conservatives may be in order.

                          It may work. After all, are the social conservatives going to vote Democrat? The worse they would do is not vote. The social conservatives are just a bunch of suckers anyway. Bush has done almost nothing for them yet they still love him.

                          Reply

                          You must be signed in to post a comment. Sign in »

                          Submitted By:
                          populist

                          The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...

                          Also submitted:

                          Related Articles:

                          Why not submit a story?

                          Also Propping This Article

                          view all »

                          Groups Watching This

                          No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?

                          Advertisement